[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130902220800.GA934@leaf>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 15:08:05 -0700
From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] [PATCH] checkpatch: Add comment about
updating Documentation/CodingStyle
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 09:50:23PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org> wrote:
>
> > > There are many checkpatch rules (like semicolons) that
> > > are not in CodingStyle.
> >
> > It's a rule of thumb, not a mandate. In *general*, checkpatch.pl should
> > not be enforcing style rules that aren't documented in CodingStyle.
>
> Except that it becomes a mandate when someone runs it automatically against
> every one of your patches and then sends you an email for each patch it finds
> a checkpatch niggle against...
I think we're talking about two different things. I wasn't talking
about checkpatch.pl itself; I was talking about the idea that every
style rule in checkpatch.pl should corresponding documentation in
CodingStyle. That's what I was calling a rule of thumb rather than a
mandate.
- Josh triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists