lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5225C38C.2090305@huawei.com>
Date:	Tue, 3 Sep 2013 19:10:04 +0800
From:	"zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
CC:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	Hyeoncheol Lee <cheol.lee@....com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] tracing/uprobes: Fetch args before reserving a
 ring buffer

On 2013/9/3 13:44, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>
> 
> Fetching from user space should be done in a non-atomic context.  So
> use a per-cpu buffer and copy its content to the ring buffer
> atomically.  Note that we can migrate during accessing user memory
> thus use a per-cpu mutex to protect concurrent accesses.
> 
> This is needed since we'll be able to fetch args from an user memory
> which can be swapped out.  Before that uprobes could fetch args from
> registers only which saved in a kernel space.
> 
> While at it, use __get_data_size() and store_trace_args() to reduce
> code duplication.
> 
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
> Cc: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> Cc: zhangwei(Jovi) <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> index 9f2d12d2311d..9ede401759ab 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
> @@ -530,21 +530,46 @@ static const struct file_operations uprobe_profile_ops = {
>  	.release	= seq_release,
>  };
>  
> +static atomic_t uprobe_buffer_ref = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
> +static void __percpu *uprobe_cpu_buffer;
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct mutex, uprobe_cpu_mutex);
> +
>  static void uprobe_trace_print(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
>  				unsigned long func, struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
>  	struct uprobe_trace_entry_head *entry;
>  	struct ring_buffer_event *event;
>  	struct ring_buffer *buffer;
> -	void *data;
> -	int size, i;
> +	struct mutex *mutex;
> +	void *data, *arg_buf;
> +	int size, dsize, esize;
> +	int cpu;
>  	struct ftrace_event_call *call = &tu->p.call;
>  
> -	size = SIZEOF_TRACE_ENTRY(is_ret_probe(tu));
> +	dsize = __get_data_size(&tu->p, regs);
> +	esize = SIZEOF_TRACE_ENTRY(is_ret_probe(tu));
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!uprobe_cpu_buffer || tu->p.size + dsize > PAGE_SIZE))
> +		return;
> +
> +	cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> +	mutex = &per_cpu(uprobe_cpu_mutex, cpu);
> +	arg_buf = per_cpu_ptr(uprobe_cpu_buffer, cpu);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Use per-cpu buffers for fastest access, but we might migrate
> +	 * so the mutex makes sure we have sole access to it.
> +	 */
> +	mutex_lock(mutex);
> +	store_trace_args(esize, &tu->p, regs, arg_buf, dsize);
> +
> +	size = esize + tu->p.size + dsize;
>  	event = trace_current_buffer_lock_reserve(&buffer, call->event.type,
> -						  size + tu->p.size, 0, 0);
> -	if (!event)
> +						  size, 0, 0);
> +	if (!event) {
> +		mutex_unlock(mutex);
>  		return;
> +	}
>  
>  	entry = ring_buffer_event_data(event);
>  	if (is_ret_probe(tu)) {
> @@ -556,13 +581,12 @@ static void uprobe_trace_print(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
>  		data = DATAOF_TRACE_ENTRY(entry, false);
>  	}
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < tu->p.nr_args; i++) {
> -		call_fetch(&tu->p.args[i].fetch, regs,
> -			   data + tu->p.args[i].offset);
> -	}
> +	memcpy(data, arg_buf, tu->p.size + dsize);
>  
>  	if (!filter_current_check_discard(buffer, call, entry, event))
>  		trace_buffer_unlock_commit(buffer, event, 0, 0);
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(mutex);
>  }
>  
>  /* uprobe handler */
> @@ -630,6 +654,17 @@ probe_event_enable(struct trace_uprobe *tu, int flag, filter_func_t filter)
>  	if (trace_probe_is_enabled(&tu->p))
>  		return -EINTR;
>  
> +	if (atomic_inc_return(&uprobe_buffer_ref) == 1) {
> +		int cpu;
> +
> +		uprobe_cpu_buffer = __alloc_percpu(PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE);
> +		if (uprobe_cpu_buffer == NULL)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +

Do we need add atomic_dec if allocate percpu buffer failed?

> +		for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> +			mutex_init(&per_cpu(uprobe_cpu_mutex, cpu));
> +	}
> +
>  	WARN_ON(!uprobe_filter_is_empty(&tu->filter));
>  
>  	tu->p.flags |= flag;
> @@ -646,6 +681,11 @@ static void probe_event_disable(struct trace_uprobe *tu, int flag)
>  	if (!trace_probe_is_enabled(&tu->p))
>  		return;
>  
> +	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&uprobe_buffer_ref)) {
> +		free_percpu(uprobe_cpu_buffer);
> +		uprobe_cpu_buffer = NULL;
> +	}
> +
>  	WARN_ON(!uprobe_filter_is_empty(&tu->filter));
>  
>  	uprobe_unregister(tu->inode, tu->offset, &tu->consumer);
> @@ -776,11 +816,33 @@ static void uprobe_perf_print(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
>  	struct ftrace_event_call *call = &tu->p.call;
>  	struct uprobe_trace_entry_head *entry;
>  	struct hlist_head *head;
> -	void *data;
> -	int size, rctx, i;
> +	struct mutex *mutex;
> +	void *data, *arg_buf;
> +	int size, dsize, esize;
> +	int cpu;
> +	int rctx;
>  
> -	size = SIZEOF_TRACE_ENTRY(is_ret_probe(tu));
> -	size = ALIGN(size + tu->p.size + sizeof(u32), sizeof(u64)) - sizeof(u32);
> +	dsize = __get_data_size(&tu->p, regs);
> +	esize = SIZEOF_TRACE_ENTRY(is_ret_probe(tu));
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!uprobe_cpu_buffer))
> +		return;
> +
> +	size = esize + tu->p.size + dsize;
> +	size = ALIGN(size + sizeof(u32), sizeof(u64)) - sizeof(u32);
> +	if (WARN_ONCE(size > PERF_MAX_TRACE_SIZE, "profile buffer not large enough"))
> +		return;
> +
> +	cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> +	mutex = &per_cpu(uprobe_cpu_mutex, cpu);
> +	arg_buf = per_cpu_ptr(uprobe_cpu_buffer, cpu);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Use per-cpu buffers for fastest access, but we might migrate
> +	 * so the mutex makes sure we have sole access to it.
> +	 */
> +	mutex_lock(mutex);
> +	store_trace_args(esize, &tu->p, regs, arg_buf, dsize);
>  
>  	preempt_disable();
>  	head = this_cpu_ptr(call->perf_events);
> @@ -800,15 +862,18 @@ static void uprobe_perf_print(struct trace_uprobe *tu,
>  		data = DATAOF_TRACE_ENTRY(entry, false);
>  	}
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < tu->p.nr_args; i++) {
> -		struct probe_arg *parg = &tu->p.args[i];
> +	memcpy(data, arg_buf, tu->p.size + dsize);
> +
> +	if (size - esize > tu->p.size + dsize) {
> +		int len = tu->p.size + dsize;
>  
> -		call_fetch(&parg->fetch, regs, data + parg->offset);
> +		memset(data + len, 0, size - esize - len);
>  	}
>  
>  	perf_trace_buf_submit(entry, size, rctx, 0, 1, regs, head, NULL);
>   out:
>  	preempt_enable();
> +	mutex_unlock(mutex);
>  }
>  
>  /* uprobe profile handler */
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ