[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130903202844.GK16724@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 13:28:44 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To: Vince Weaver <vince@...ter.net>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] perf, x86: Support Haswell v4 LBR format v2
> > + PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ABORT_TX = 1U << 7, /* transaction aborts */
> > + PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IN_TX = 1U << 8, /* in transaction */
> > + PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_NO_TX = 1U << 9, /* not in transaction */
>
> so if you specify these flags in branch_sample_type, what information
> appears in the branch record?
This is just a filter, so when set branches that do not satisfy
the filter are not reported.
The patches to export the new fields haven't been merged yet.
>
> If you get an abort, what address appears in the record?
Abort is a jump from the abort point to the abort handler or
the HLE XACQUIRE lock instruction.
> What does it mean in regards to a branch entry to be or not be in a
> transaction?
When the branch is executed the CPU is in the transactional execution
state.
>
> If you set "in transaction" does that then only record branches that are
> in transactions?
Yes, like all the other branch filter flags.
> What happens if you set both in transaction and not in?
Then you get all branches.
>
> Is there some sort of document from intel you can link to that describes
> all of this?
http://download.intel.com/products/processor/manual/253669.pdf
Chapter 17.8
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists