[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5227C928.8080709@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 19:58:32 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm, compaction: periodically schedule when freeing pages
On 09/04/2013 07:25 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> We've been getting warnings about an excessive amount of time spent
> allocating pages for migration during memory compaction without
> scheduling. isolate_freepages_block() already periodically checks for
> contended locks or the need to schedule, but isolate_freepages() never
> does.
>
> When a zone is massively long and no suitable targets can be found, this
> iteration can be quite expensive without ever doing cond_resched().
>
> Check periodically for the need to reschedule while the compaction free
> scanner iterates.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists