[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130910132032.GO22421@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:20:32 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm, compaction: periodically schedule when freeing pages
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 04:25:59PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> We've been getting warnings about an excessive amount of time spent
> allocating pages for migration during memory compaction without
> scheduling. isolate_freepages_block() already periodically checks for
> contended locks or the need to schedule, but isolate_freepages() never
> does.
>
> When a zone is massively long and no suitable targets can be found, this
> iteration can be quite expensive without ever doing cond_resched().
>
> Check periodically for the need to reschedule while the compaction free
> scanner iterates.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Ok, fair enough.
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
However I'm curious. Do you know why the combined use of
compact_cached_free_pfn and pageblock skip bits is not enough for the scanner
to quickly find a pageblock that is suitable for isolate_freepages_block()?
Is the pageblock skip information getting cleared frequently by kswapd
or something?
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists