linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] preempt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130910153500.GJ31370@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Tue, 10 Sep 2013 17:35:00 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
	Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] preempt_count rework -v2

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 08:29:16AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:

> also.. yuck on using "dec" "dec" sucks, please use "sub foo  ,1"
> instead (dec sucks because of its broken flags behavior; it creates
> basically a bubble in the pipeline)

Then someone needs to go change:

  atomic{,64}_dec*()
  local{,64}_dec*()
  percpu_add_op()

All of which use decl/incl, percpu_add_op() actually goes out of its way
to generate them.

Also, subl ,1 is 4 bytes larger.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/