linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/38] ARM: ux500: CONFIG: Enable ST's IIO Accelerometer Sensors by default

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130910153543.GB11227@lee--X1>
Date:	Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:35:43 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	jic23@....ac.uk, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	LinusW <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, denis.ciocca@...com,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/38] ARM: ux500: CONFIG: Enable ST's IIO Accelerometer
 Sensors by default

On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Olof Johansson wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/configs/u8500_defconfig | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/u8500_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/u8500_defconfig
> > index 6b29109..24f88d6 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/configs/u8500_defconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm/configs/u8500_defconfig
> > @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE=65536
> >  CONFIG_SENSORS_BH1780=y
> >  CONFIG_IIO=y
> >  CONFIG_IIO_ST_PRESS=y
> > +CONFIG_IIO_ST_ACCEL_3AXIS=y
> >  CONFIG_NETDEVICES=y
> >  CONFIG_SMSC911X=y
> >  CONFIG_SMSC_PHY=y
> 
> This is ridiculous.
> 
> I know lwn.net's patch author statistics are fun to be on, but

Jealousy won't get you anywhere... ;)

> splitting this and the other config update into two patches? Really?

I haven't split anything. I created the patches as I was
enabling/testing the drivers, which was at completely different
times. The only reason they're close together in the set is because I
reorganised it and didn't think it was necessary to squash them
together.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/