[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpomCXoO20cQyCrWtN0WgWnzvVmEqFxuwTU8V0GpXsQxgHw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 12:26:56 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] cpufreq: use correct values of cpus in __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish()
On 12 September 2013 12:17, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> Currently cpus never become zero as we clear mask only while there are
> more than one cpu in a policy... Wait let me see what's the cleanest way
> to get this fixed..
Okay, simply replace cpumask_first() with cpumask_any_but() in
cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu() :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists