linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] cpufreq: use correct values of cpus in __cpufreq_remove_dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52316A40.4050600@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Thu, 12 Sep 2013 12:46:16 +0530
From:	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
	"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] cpufreq: use correct values of cpus in __cpufreq_remove_dev_finish()

On 09/12/2013 12:26 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 12 September 2013 12:17, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
>> Currently cpus never become zero as we clear mask only while there are
>> more than one cpu in a policy... Wait let me see what's the cleanest way
>> to get this fixed..
> 
> Okay, simply replace cpumask_first() with cpumask_any_but() in
> cpufreq_nominate_new_policy_cpu() :)
> 

That sounds good! Even the naming is much better, it conveys the intent
clearly.

Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/