[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130912144031.GU22421@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:40:31 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 41/50] sched: numa: Use {cpu, pid} to create task groups
for shared faults
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:42:18PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> Hello Mel
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
> >
> > +void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p)
> > +{
> > + struct numa_group *grp = p->numa_group;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + kfree(p->numa_faults);
> > +
> > + if (grp) {
> > + for (i = 0; i < 2*nr_node_ids; i++)
> > + atomic_long_sub(p->numa_faults[i], &grp->faults[i]);
> > +
> use after free, numa_faults ;/
>
It gets fixed in the patch "sched: numa: use group fault statistics in
numa placement" but I agree that it's the wrong place to fix it.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists