lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:40:31 +0100
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To:	Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 41/50] sched: numa: Use {cpu, pid} to create task groups
 for shared faults

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:42:18PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> Hello Mel
> 
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
> >
> > +void task_numa_free(struct task_struct *p)
> > +{
> > +       struct numa_group *grp = p->numa_group;
> > +       int i;
> > +
> > +       kfree(p->numa_faults);
> > +
> > +       if (grp) {
> > +               for (i = 0; i < 2*nr_node_ids; i++)
> > +                       atomic_long_sub(p->numa_faults[i], &grp->faults[i]);
> > +
> use after free, numa_faults ;/
> 

It gets fixed in the patch "sched: numa: use group fault statistics in
numa placement" but I agree that it's the wrong place to fix it.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists