lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:11:11 +0100 From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> To: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/50] sched: monolithic code dump of what is being pushed upstream On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:11:03AM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote: > > @@ -5045,15 +5038,50 @@ static int need_active_balance(struct lb_env *env) > > > > static int active_load_balance_cpu_stop(void *data); > > > > +static int should_we_balance(struct lb_env *env) > > +{ > > + struct sched_group *sg = env->sd->groups; > > + struct cpumask *sg_cpus, *sg_mask; > > + int cpu, balance_cpu = -1; > > + > > + /* > > + * In the newly idle case, we will allow all the cpu's > > + * to do the newly idle load balance. > > + */ > > + if (env->idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE) > > + return 1; > > + > > + sg_cpus = sched_group_cpus(sg); > > + sg_mask = sched_group_mask(sg); > > + /* Try to find first idle cpu */ > > + for_each_cpu_and(cpu, sg_cpus, env->cpus) { > > + if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, sg_mask) || !idle_cpu(cpu)) > > + continue; > > + > > + balance_cpu = cpu; > > + break; > > + } > > + > > + if (balance_cpu == -1) > > + balance_cpu = group_balance_cpu(sg); > > + > > + /* > > + * First idle cpu or the first cpu(busiest) in this sched group > > + * is eligible for doing load balancing at this and above domains. > > + */ > > + return balance_cpu != env->dst_cpu; > > FYI: Here is a bug reported by Dave Chinner. > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/10/1 > > And lets see if any changes in your SpecJBB results without it. > Thanks for pointing that out. I've picked up the one-liner fix. -- Mel Gorman SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists