linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2] pstore: Adjust buffer size for compression for smaller registered buffers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F31CF6AB8@ORSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 12 Sep 2013 17:43:56 +0000
From:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:	Aruna Balakrishnaiah <aruna@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"linuxppc-dev@...abs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
	"seiji.aguchi@....com" <seiji.aguchi@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>
CC:	"jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <mahesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"cbouatmailru@...il.com" <cbouatmailru@...il.com>,
	"ananth@...ibm.com" <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	"ccross@...roid.com" <ccross@...roid.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] pstore: Adjust buffer size for compression for
 smaller registered buffers

+	default:
+		cmpr = 60;
+		break;
+	}
 
Is this the right "default"?  It may be a good choice for a backend with a really
tiny buffer (1 ... 999).  But less good for a (theoretical) backend with a larger
buffer (10001 ... infinity and beyond).  Which are you trying to catch here?

-Tony