[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130913021349.GB9445@thunk.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 22:13:49 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
David Safford <safford@...ibm.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Leonidas Da Silva Barbosa <leosilva@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ashley Lai <ashley@...leylai.com>,
Rajiv Andrade <mail@...jiv.net>,
Marcel Selhorst <tpmdd@...horst.net>,
Sirrix AG <tpmdd@...rix.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kent Yoder <key@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Safford <safford@...son.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>,
"Johnston, DJ" <dj.johnston@...el.com>
Subject: Re: TPMs and random numbers
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 06:23:09PM -0400, Jörn Engel wrote:
> It is worse in three ways:
> - it costs performance,
> - it may create a false sense of safety and
> - it actively does harm if we credit it as entropy.
>
> How much weight you assign to each of those is up to you. So long as
> we don't credit any of it as entropy, I am not too adverse to mixing
> it in. But I can equally see benefit in burning the bridges.
Well, mixing it in and using /dev/[u]random is certainly better than
blindly using the output from the RNG from the TPM directly as a
key.
I'm not sure what you mean by "burning the bridges"; what is the
alternative that you are suggesting?
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists