lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 12 Sep 2013 22:22:08 -0400
From:	Jörn Engel <>
To:	Theodore Ts'o <>
Cc:	Andy Lutomirski <>,
	Jeff Garzik <>,
	David Safford <>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <>,
	Leonidas Da Silva Barbosa <>,
	Ashley Lai <>,
	Rajiv Andrade <>,
	Marcel Selhorst <>,
	Sirrix AG <>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
	Kent Yoder <>,
	David Safford <>,
	Mimi Zohar <>,
	"Johnston, DJ" <>
Subject: Re: TPMs and random numbers

On Thu, 12 September 2013 22:13:49 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 06:23:09PM -0400, Jörn Engel wrote:
> > It is worse in three ways:
> > - it costs performance,
> > - it may create a false sense of safety and
> > - it actively does harm if we credit it as entropy.
> > 
> > How much weight you assign to each of those is up to you.  So long as
> > we don't credit any of it as entropy, I am not too adverse to mixing
> > it in.  But I can equally see benefit in burning the bridges.
> Well, mixing it in and using /dev/[u]random is certainly better than
> blindly using the output from the RNG from the TPM directly as a
> key.


> I'm not sure what you mean by "burning the bridges"; what is the
> alternative that you are suggesting?

Not using hardware RNGs at all, see three messages back.  We know
those things can be compromised, we know a compromise cannot be
detected and we know of people/groups that have both a strong
motivation and likely the ability to pull it off.

I am not taking sides, but I can see good arguments for both


-- more straw can't possibly matter...
-- Kirby Bakken
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists