[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpo=kBvx3-fkmOUzk3PsbGZxicAWD9iJyUBkXYG-1wM_WNA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:53:09 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc: Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: make sure frequency transitions are serialized
On 12 September 2013 15:40, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> Some part of this patch was pushed in mainline earlier but was then removed due
> to loopholes in the patch. Those are now fixed and this patch is tested by the
> people who reported these problems.
>
> Whenever we are changing frequency of a cpu, we are calling PRECHANGE and
> POSTCHANGE notifiers. They must be serialized. i.e. PRECHANGE or POSTCHANGE
> shouldn't be called twice contiguously. Also, calls to cpufreq_driver_target()
> or cpufreq_driver->target() must also be serialized. Following examples show why
> this is important:
Adding:
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Picked from the other thread..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists