[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpokEc1vZacN2X+8_cY8DF1wehSE6yaZ5-SQbqtt5qUUW_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:56:18 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
cpufreq <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cpufreq_stats NULL deref on second system suspend
On 12 September 2013 22:56, Srivatsa S. Bhat
<srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 09/12/2013 09:25 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Anyway, nevermind, as of now, subsystems do work around this suitably, so
> there is no known bug as such at the present. Just that we could have probably
> done it a better way, that's all.
Yeah, there is no bug as of now due to the number of hacks adopted by different
framework.. I believe we can still have a cleanup series to take care
of this stuff..
That would be some improvement and would be better for future.. Otherwise
this kind of problems would keep coming again and again..
> You're absolutely right! Regular CPU hotplug is more demanding than
> suspend/resume in the context we are discussing, since any CPU can be
> hotplugged at any time and put back in any order. So code like cpufreq should
> be prepared to work with any ordering.
And that part is well implemented and tested as far as I know..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists