[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130916112614.GC16984@lee--X1>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 12:26:14 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Denis CIOCCA <denis.ciocca@...com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jic23@....ac.uk" <jic23@....ac.uk>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 38/38] iio: magn-core: st: Provide support for the
LSM303DLH
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013, Denis CIOCCA wrote:
> Hi Lee,
>
> > The driver mentions that the first group of sensors have a WAI of
> > 0x3c: #define ST_MAGN_1_WAI_EXP 0x3c And when I print out the WAI read
> > from the device: Requested device: lsm303dlh_magn - read WAI: 0x3c I
> > guess I could have been lied to again by the board's datasheet again
> > and the attached device isn't actually a LSM303DLH, but how can I tell
> > for sure?
> On LSM303DLH you have to read 0x0a 0x0b and 0x0c registers, you have to
> find 0x48, 0x34 and 0x33. I think in the snowball there is the LSM303DLHC.
I just did that too:
Device: lsm303dlh_magn: WAI: (0x3c)
st_magn_common_probe(): IR: ID1 (0x48) ID2 (0x34) ID3 (0x33)
It appears the LSM303DLH does have a populated WAI register after all.
Now what? :)
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists