linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mfd: arizona: Update volatile registers for WM5110 DSP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130917091823.GF3635@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:18:23 +0100
From:	Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	sameo@...ux.intel.com, patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: arizona: Update volatile registers for WM5110 DSP

No problem sorry the commit message was a little vague there.
Seems I accidentally generated the first version of this patch
against the ASoC tree, but this got me thinking now you are
looking after MFD patches which tree should I be generating them
against?

Thanks,
Charles

On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 08:24:25AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Sep 2013, Charles Keepax wrote:
> 
> Any chance of a little more information in the commit message?
> 
> What are scratch registers and why are they required now where they
> weren't before? Why are the control and clocking regulators no longer
> needed?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/