[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYc4UTbpa5W-KY_D7hRUYi9N3Ny1+CPJ-aixeEk3WGHCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 14:51:48 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: George Cherian <george.cherian@...com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>
Cc: "linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
Nikolay Balandin <n.a.balandin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] cleanup of gpio_pcf857x.c
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:03 AM, George Cherian <george.cherian@...com> wrote:
> This patch series
> - removes the irq_demux_work
> - Uses devm_request_threaded_irq
> - Call the user handler iff gpio_to_irq is done.
>
> v1 --> v2
> Split v1 to 3 patches
> v2 --> v3
> Remove the unnecessary dts patches.
> v3 --> v4
> Remove gpio->irq (in patch 2)
Applied all three patches with Kuninoro's ACK.
However your last iteration was still labeled "v3" in the subject
so I was a bit confused, but I took all those sent on sep 4.
Please check the result in my GPIO tree or linux-next and
make sure it works.
> Note: these patches were made after applying [1].
> [1] - [PATCH v5] gpio: pcf857x: Add OF support - https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/27/70
Well that patch is not finished, but by rebasing patch 2
with patch -p1 < patch2.patch it applied anyway.
Now Laurent has to finalize his DT bindings on top
of your patches instead.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists