linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] cleanup of gpio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1695077.V4sgFrjTJR@avalon>
Date:	Wed, 18 Sep 2013 00:56:19 +0200
From:	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	George Cherian <george.cherian@...com>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
	Nikolay Balandin <n.a.balandin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] cleanup of gpio_pcf857x.c

Hi Linus,

On Tuesday 17 September 2013 14:51:48 Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:03 AM, George Cherian wrote:
> > This patch series
> > 
> >         - removes the irq_demux_work
> >         - Uses devm_request_threaded_irq
> >         - Call the user handler iff gpio_to_irq is done.
> > 
> > v1 --> v2
> > 
> >         Split v1 to 3 patches
> > 
> > v2 --> v3
> > 
> >         Remove the unnecessary dts patches.
> > 
> > v3 --> v4
> > 
> >         Remove gpio->irq (in patch 2)
> 
> Applied all three patches with Kuninoro's ACK.
> 
> However your last iteration was still labeled "v3" in the subject
> so I was a bit confused, but I took all those sent on sep 4.
> 
> Please check the result in my GPIO tree or linux-next and
> make sure it works.
> 
> > Note: these patches were made after applying [1].
> > [1] - [PATCH v5] gpio: pcf857x: Add OF support -
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/27/70
>
> Well that patch is not finished, but by rebasing patch 2 with
> patch -p1 < patch2.patch it applied anyway.
> 
> Now Laurent has to finalize his DT bindings on top of your patches instead.

I will do so. At first sight I don't see any conflict issue.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/