lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52386A38.2050401@windriver.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:42:00 -0400
From:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To:	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
CC:	Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
	linux-scsi list <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: delete decade+ obsolete aic7xxx_old driver

On 13-09-17 10:29 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 09/17/2013 04:13 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
>> Yes, this driver is well past ready to be removed.
>>
>> Acked-by: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
>>
>> Sent from my ASUS Pad
>>
>> Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com> wrote:
>>
>>> After getting warnings in an allyesconfig build[1] from this
>>> driver, I decided to remind myself just how old it was, and
>>> whether it warranted fixing.  In the Kconfig help text, I found:
>>>
>>>  "This driver will eventually be phased out entirely"
>>>
>>> Going back to the history archive, I see the line was added[2]
>>> in Feb 2002, when we moved from v2.4.2.1 ---> v2.4.2.2
>>>
>>> So, with over a decade of notification, and multiple major releases
>>> since then, I think we can justify removing this.  Currently we have
>>> people wasting time building it during routine testing, and then
>>> wasting more time re-researching the known reported warnings, only to
>>> find that nobody really is willing to integrate the fixes[3] for it.
>>>
>>> A quick search didn't seem to indicate any active user base for it.
>>> If someone happens to have a quirky _old_ card that the eleven year
>>> old "new" driver doesn't work with, then it is entirely reasonable
>>> that they stick with a kernel version that predates this removal.
>>>
>>> [1] drivers/scsi/aic7xxx_old.c: In function ‘aic7xxx_register’:
>>>    drivers/scsi/aic7xxx_old.c:7901:5: warning: case value ‘257’ not in enumerated type ‘ahc_chip’ [-Wswitch]
>>>    drivers/scsi/aic7xxx_old.c:7898:5: warning: case value ‘513’ not in enumerated type ‘ahc_chip’ [-Wswitch]
>>>    drivers/scsi/aic7xxx_old.c: In function ‘aic7xxx_load_seeprom’:
>>>    drivers/scsi/aic7xxx_old.c:8517:5: warning: case value ‘257’ not in enumerated type ‘ahc_chip’ [-Wswitch]
>>>    drivers/scsi/aic7xxx_old.c:8510:5: warning: case value ‘513’ not in enumerated type ‘ahc_chip’ [-Wswitch]
>>>
>>> [2] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git commit 44e8778c
>>>
>>> [3] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/29/215
>>>
>>> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
>>> Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
>>> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
> 
> However, if we do this we're removing support for any non-PCI based
> adapters. I personally doubt that there are any installations left
> running on (E)ISA or VLB. But we should be clear on this.

Is the Kconfig text for the "new" driver wrong then?  It says:

 ---------------------
config SCSI_AIC7XXX
        tristate "Adaptec AIC7xxx Fast -> U160 support (New Driver)"
        depends on (PCI || EISA) && SCSI
        select SCSI_SPI_ATTRS
        ---help---
        This driver supports all of Adaptec's Fast through Ultra 160 PCI
        based SCSI controllers as well as the aic7770 based EISA and VLB
        SCSI controllers (the 274x and 284x series).
 ---------------------

So, as long as you'd enabled either of PCI or EISA, a VLB card should
work too.  (Of course you are correct in doubting that anyone is genuinely
using a 486 VLB system with ~16MB RAM, so it is largely a moot point.)

[I probably could delete that "(New Driver)" text as part of this commit too].

Thanks,
Paul.
--

> 
> In general I'm in favour removing obsolete drivers, so
> 
> Acked-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Hannes
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ