[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5988412.MKVQTjx6Fi@mistral>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:49:44 -0700
From: Alexey Neyman <stilor@....net>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
linux-acpi <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH PING] Fix coalescing of host bridge windows in arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
[Resending without HTML part - sorry for possible duplicates]
As requested by Peter, resending the patch with ACPI/x86 maintainers CC'ed.
Short description:
Make coalesce_windows() handle multiple resource overlaps.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Neyman <stilor@....net>
Regards,
Alexey.
On Monday, September 16, 2013 07:31:58 PM Peter Hurley wrote:
> [ +cc Bjorn Helgaas, Rafael Wysocki, linux-acpi ]
>
> On 09/16/2013 12:41 PM, Alexey Neyman wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Could anybody review/commit the patch?
>
> LKML is a pretty general list and maintainers don't typically
> trawl the list for more work to do. The get_maintainer script
> can be used to help determine to whom to address a patch.
>
> peter@...r:~/src/kernels/next$ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f
> arch/x86/pci/acpi.c Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> (maintainer:X86
> ARCHITECTURE...) Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com> (maintainer:X86
> ARCHITECTURE...)
> "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> (maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE...)
> x86@...nel.org (maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE...)
> Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> (commit_signer:5/8=62%)
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com> (commit_signer:3/8=38%)
> Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com> (commit_signer:1/8=12%)
> Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com> (commit_signer:1/8=12%)
> Mike Yoknis <mike.yoknis@...com> (commit_signer:1/8=12%)
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
>
> Regards,
> Peter Hurley
>
> PS - You'll want to inline your patch as well because as you can see
> replies don't include it.
>
> > Regards,
> > Alexey.
> >
> > On Thursday, September 12, 2013 05:19:16 pm Alexey Neyman wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have a board with a BIOS bug that reports the following I/O port
> >> regions
> >> in _CRS on one of the host bridges:
> >>
> >> 0x0000-0x03af // #0
> >> 0x03e0-0x0cf7 // #1
> >> 0x03b0-0x03bb // #2
> >> 0x03c0-0x03df // #3
> >> 0x0000-0xdfff // #4
> >> 0xf000-0xffff // #5
> >>
> >> Obviously, region number #4 is erroneous as it overlaps with regions
> >> #0..3.
> >> However, code in coalesce_windows() in arch/x86/pci/acpi.c attempts to
> >> recover from such kind of BIOS bugs by merging the overlapping regions.
> >> Current code expands region #0 to 0x0000-0xdffff and makes region #4
> >> ignored. As a result, overlap of the expanded region #0 with regions
> >> #1..3
> >> remains undetected. As a result, regions #1..3 are inserted into the
> >> resource tree as if they were consumers of the 0x0000-0xdfff regions, and
> >> devices that have resources in one of these regions (e.g. 0x3f6 for
> >> legacy
> >> IDE) have a resource conflict - the kernel does not initialize them.
> >>
> >> The attached patch makes the code in coalesce_windows() instead ignore
> >> res1
> >> (which is already dealt with), possibly expanding res2 instead. As res2
> >> has
> >> not been reached in the outer loop in coalesce_windows(), the code will
> >> then check for overlaps of the just-expanded resource with the rest of
> >> the
> >> resources.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Alexey.
View attachment "acpi.c.diff" of type "text/x-patch" (634 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists