[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5238F8AF.4050309@hurleysoftware.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 20:49:51 -0400
From: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
CC: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: increased vmap_area_lock contentions on "n_tty: Move buffers
into n_tty_data"
On 09/12/2013 09:09 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 08:51:33AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> FYI, we noticed much increased vmap_area_lock contentions since this
>> commit:
>>
>> commit 20bafb3d23d108bc0a896eb8b7c1501f4f649b77
>> Author: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
>> Date: Sat Jun 15 10:21:19 2013 -0400
>>
>> n_tty: Move buffers into n_tty_data
>>
>> Reduce pointer reloading and improve locality-of-reference;
>> allocate read_buf and echo_buf within struct n_tty_data.
>
> Here are some comparison between this commit [o] with its parent commit [*].
[...]
> 8cb06c983822103da1cf 20bafb3d23d108bc0a89
> ------------------------ ------------------------
> 976.67 +108.3% 2034.67 lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-TCP_STREAM
> 8971.36 +11.4% 9997.05 nhm-white/micro/aim7/exec_test
> 9948.03 +20.9% 12031.72 TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-128.active_objs
>
> 8cb06c983822103da1cf 20bafb3d23d108bc0a89
> ------------------------ ------------------------
> 976.67 +108.3% 2034.67 lkp-a04/micro/netperf/120s-200%-TCP_STREAM
> 9127.64 +11.4% 10164.15 nhm-white/micro/aim7/exec_test
> 10104.31 +20.7% 12198.82 TOTAL slabinfo.kmalloc-128.num_objs
The dramatic increase in 128-byte kmalloc blocks is from vmalloc overhead
with associated with each allocation. On a x86_64, struct vmap_area is 104 bytes,
rounded to 128, allocated with every vmalloc allocation. This is approx 1% overhead
(which seems high to me).
The reason this is still visible after the test completes is the vmap area is
lazily reclaimed (see mm/vmalloc.c:__purge_vmap_area_lazy()).
1% memory overhead coupled with the unwanted vmap_area_lock contention (even though it is
test-induced) -- I might revert this anyway.
Regards,
Peter Hurley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists