lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87B0A48E21A1974AB4780BA3191524C20E64FB@MYMBX4.stec-inc.ad>
Date:	Thu, 19 Sep 2013 12:09:43 +0000
From:	Akhil Bhansali <AkhilAshok.Bhansali@...t.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
CC:	kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	OS Engineering <osengineering@...c-inc.com>,
	Ramprasad Chinthekindi <Ramprasad.Chinthekindi@...t.com>,
	"jmoyer@...hat.com" <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Amit Phansalkar" <Amit.Phansalkar@...t.com>
Subject: RE: [block:for-next 5/6] drivers/block/skd_main.c:441:3: error:
 implicit declaration of function 'readq'

Hi Jens,

Here is patch which takes care of removal of unused readq / readl function. I shall get rid of many VPRINTKs in the code in the subsequent patches.

I have prepared this patch on top of earlier patch I had sent out.  Please let me know if you have any comments.

Thank you.
--------------
>From 0c175433db8079e93890ebfcd736fa8756aa88af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Akhil Bhansali <bhansaliakhil@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 17:28:18 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] block: skd: Changes to remove unused readq / readl function
 calls.

These changes are to remove readq functions which is not used.
Signed-off-by: Akhil Bhansali <abhansali@...c-inc.com>
---
 drivers/block/skd_main.c |    8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/skd_main.c b/drivers/block/skd_main.c
index 0f25830..4c03b08 100644
--- a/drivers/block/skd_main.c
+++ b/drivers/block/skd_main.c
@@ -421,14 +421,10 @@ static inline void skd_reg_write32(struct skd_device *skdev, u32 val,
 	if (likely(skdev->dbg_level < 2)) {
 		writel(val, skdev->mem_map[1] + offset);
 		barrier();
-		readl(skdev->mem_map[1] + offset);
-		barrier();
 	} else {
 		barrier();
 		writel(val, skdev->mem_map[1] + offset);
 		barrier();
-		readl(skdev->mem_map[1] + offset);
-		barrier();
 		VPRINTK(skdev, "offset %x = %x\n", offset, val);
 	}
 }
@@ -439,14 +435,10 @@ static inline void skd_reg_write64(struct skd_device *skdev, u64 val,
 	if (likely(skdev->dbg_level < 2)) {
 		writeq(val, skdev->mem_map[1] + offset);
 		barrier();
-		readq(skdev->mem_map[1] + offset);
-		barrier();
 	} else {
 		barrier();
 		writeq(val, skdev->mem_map[1] + offset);
 		barrier();
-		readq(skdev->mem_map[1] + offset);
-		barrier();
 		VPRINTK(skdev, "offset %x = %016llx\n", offset, val);
 	}
 }
-- 
________________________________________
From: Jens Axboe [axboe@...nel.dk]
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 8:06 PM
To: Akhil Bhansali
Cc: kbuild test robot; OS Engineering; Ramprasad Chinthekindi; jmoyer@...hat.com; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Amit Phansalkar
Subject: Re: [block:for-next 5/6] drivers/block/skd_main.c:441:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'readq'

On Wed, Sep 18 2013, Akhil Bhansali wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> Please accept this patch that takes care of warnings related to i386 compilation.
> 1. Implicit function declaration of readq and writeq.
> 2. Format related warnings for VPRINTK.

You should get rid of the VPRINTK() as well, we do have debug facilities
in place you can use for printing.

And as mentioned a week or so ago, readq() isn't even used.

--
Jens Axboe


PROPRIETARY-CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION INCLUDED

This electronic transmission, and any documents attached hereto, may contain confidential, proprietary and/or legally privileged information. The information is intended only for use by the recipient named above. If you received this electronic message in error, please notify the sender and delete the electronic message. Any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of information received in error is strictly prohibited, and violators will be pursued legally.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ