[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130919164830.GB9427@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 18:48:30 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, len.brown@...el.com, rjw@...k.pl,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/6] bitops: Introduce BIT_ULL
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 09:00:34AM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> Adding BIT(x) equivalent for unsigned long long type, BIT_ULL(x).
>
> Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
> include/linux/bitops.h | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bitops.h b/include/linux/bitops.h
> index a3b6b82..34e9e94 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bitops.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bitops.h
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>
> #ifdef __KERNEL__
> #define BIT(nr) (1UL << (nr))
> +#define BIT_ULL(nr) (1ULL << (nr))
We already have BIT_64 for that.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists