[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <523B2F57.2050504@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 10:07:35 -0700
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, len.brown@...el.com, rjw@...k.pl,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/6] bitops: Introduce BIT_ULL
On 09/19/2013 09:48 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 09:00:34AM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
>> Adding BIT(x) equivalent for unsigned long long type, BIT_ULL(x).
>>
>> Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
>> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/bitops.h | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/bitops.h b/include/linux/bitops.h
>> index a3b6b82..34e9e94 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/bitops.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/bitops.h
>> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>>
>> #ifdef __KERNEL__
>> #define BIT(nr) (1UL << (nr))
>> +#define BIT_ULL(nr) (1ULL << (nr))
> We already have BIT_64 for that.
>
The current definition for BIT_64 is in arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h. I
feel it should be applicable for all architectures and move to some
common file.
Thanks,
Srinivas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists