[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130919172819.GD9412@pd.tnic>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 19:28:19 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, len.brown@...el.com, rjw@...k.pl,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/6] bitops: Introduce BIT_ULL
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:07:35AM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> The current definition for BIT_64 is in arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h.
> I feel it should be applicable for all architectures and move to some
> common file.
Feel free to move it there or change BIT_64 to BIT_ULL or whatever ...
just don't add yet another redundant macro.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists