| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1379647499.2145.24.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 20:24:59 -0700 From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com> To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>, Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] perf lock: misc fixes and enhancements On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 16:00 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 07:19:12PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso escreveu: > > This patchset is a first in a series of perf-lock enhancements I am working > > on. Overall it is pretty straightforward, dealing with cleanups, and some > > cosmetic changes. > > > > Patches 1-3 deal with some minor fixes and cleanups. > > > > Patch 4 fixes a segfault in the report command when the perf.data > > file is generated by a non perf-lock command. > > > > Patch 5 and 6 are cosmetic changes. > > Applied all but patch 5, since Mitake-san had concerns about it, lemme > know if that changed. > Thanks Arnaldo! By the way, we probably want patch 4 in stable, since it does fix a day 1 bug. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists