linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: return EEXIST instead of EBUSY for second registering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKohpom-3orEns00DC2=uk4pgV_xnfRpM1hrdyK9pjPUEgBXrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Sep 2013 09:53:39 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: return EEXIST instead of EBUSY for second registering

On 20 September 2013 07:01, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> Sorry,  looks like this one is not enough.
>
> please let me know if you prefer me send addon patch
> or revised one.

Atleast you can let us know what the problem is? And then we
can decide on that.. But anyway, you can send a new patch
based over latest linux-next (which will have your original patch),
and then leave it onto Rafael to merge it or have two patches..
(though I am quite sure he will not drop anything now, unless its
too screwed.., at worst he might revert it..)..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/