[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQU5PD4asdE3=sBSnLK8fwPT8vK81FAOuYtAWj_3ruyS0g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 22:30:04 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: return EEXIST instead of EBUSY for second registering
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 20 September 2013 07:01, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>> Sorry, looks like this one is not enough.
>>
>> please let me know if you prefer me send addon patch
>> or revised one.
>
> Atleast you can let us know what the problem is? And then we
> can decide on that.. But anyway, you can send a new patch
> based over latest linux-next (which will have your original patch),
> and then leave it onto Rafael to merge it or have two patches..
> (though I am quite sure he will not drop anything now, unless its
> too screwed.., at worst he might revert it..)..
looks like the crash is intermittent..., so i thought that patch fixed
the problem.
but later I found other suspicious print out.
please check new one:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2915181/
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists