lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130923075810.GC2185@lee--X1>
Date:	Mon, 23 Sep 2013 08:58:10 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Milo Kim <milo.kim@...com>
Cc:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] Documentation: add LP3943 DT bindings and document

> >>+++ b/Documentation/lp3943.txt
> >>@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
> >>+TI/National Semiconductor LP3943 MFD driver
> >>+===========================================

<snip>

> >Why do you need to document your driver in this way?
> >
> >If this stuff is really important (and most of it really isn't), then
> >put it either in the commit log or in the driver.
> 
> Unnecessary documentation makes it noisy, but I think the LP3943
> still needs the driver documentation for better understanding.
> 
> Many people think LP3943 is just LED driver, but I really want to
> share the application usages - PWM generators and GPIO expanders.
> If the driver just supports LED functionality, then it would be
> created as LED class driver. However, this patch-set enables more
> generic driver usages.
> So, this documentation would be helpful.
> 
> And I want to keep the code and the documentation separate.
> If the link address is changed, then only documentation file will be
> modified, not source file.
> 
> So, I'd like to create the fifth patch-set with new MFD
> documentation subdirectory.
> Additionally, LP3943 platform data example code will be added in the
> 'Documentation/mfd/lp3943.txt'. It's for a platform which doesn't
> support the device tree.

So, I'd actually like to get Sam's opinion on this.

NB: The documentation looks pretty rough at the moment. If we decide
to accept the concept, it will have to be adapted quite a bit before
full acceptance of the document will be granted.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ