linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/26] ARM: dove: remove custom .init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130923091036.GE4999@lunn.ch>
Date:	Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:10:36 +0200
From:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
Cc:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/26] ARM: dove: remove custom .init_time hook

On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 02:20:28PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> On 09/21/2013 02:22 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 07:53:44PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> >>With arch/arm calling of_clk_init(NULL) from time_init(), we can now
> >>remove custom .init_time hooks. While at it, also remove some obsolete
> >>includes.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
> >>---
> >>Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
> >>Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> >>Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
> >>Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> >>Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
> >>Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> >>Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> >>---
> >>  arch/arm/mach-dove/board-dt.c |   11 -----------
> >>  1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
> [...]
> >Boot tested on cubox.
> >
> >Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> 
> Thanks Andrew!
> 
> Aren't you giving any Acks for dove/kirkwood anymore?

Hi Sebastian

In my opinion, a Tested-by: has more weight than an Acked-by. I could
of given you an Acked-by in about 60 seconds, given the simplicity of
the patch. It took a lot more effort to get your tree, build it, fix
my binutils, since it was the first 3.12 tree i had tried and my
binutils was too old, and boot it.

	 Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/