linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/26] ARM: dove: remove custom .init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Sep 2013 09:32:05 -0400
From:	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
To:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/26] ARM: dove: remove custom .init_time hook

On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:10:36AM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 02:20:28PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > On 09/21/2013 02:22 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > >On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 07:53:44PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> > >>With arch/arm calling of_clk_init(NULL) from time_init(), we can now
> > >>remove custom .init_time hooks. While at it, also remove some obsolete
> > >>includes.
> > >>
> > >>Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>
> > >>---
> > >>Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
> > >>Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > >>Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
> > >>Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> > >>Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
> > >>Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> > >>Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > >>---
> > >>  arch/arm/mach-dove/board-dt.c |   11 -----------
> > >>  1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
> > [...]
> > >Boot tested on cubox.
> > >
> > >Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> > 
> > Thanks Andrew!
> > 
> > Aren't you giving any Acks for dove/kirkwood anymore?
> 
> Hi Sebastian
> 
> In my opinion, a Tested-by: has more weight than an Acked-by. I could
> of given you an Acked-by in about 60 seconds, given the simplicity of
> the patch. It took a lot more effort to get your tree, build it, fix
> my binutils, since it was the first 3.12 tree i had tried and my
> binutils was too old, and boot it.

I would even go so far as to say that a Tested-by: from a maintainer
carries an implied Ack.  ;-)

And, just for the record,

Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>

thx,

Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/