linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] Add smp support for Allwinner A20(sunxi 7i).

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK3cCByGeAK2H83bP0wy=kC_+kj4Q8cFHPQ1gYUJ=uv4gs-T-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Sep 2013 22:43:55 +0800
From:	cinifr <cinifr@...il.com>
To:	Ian Campbell <ijc@...lion.org.uk>
Cc:	"linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com" <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
	"coosty@....com" <coosty@....com>,
	"maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com" <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	"daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
	"pawel.moll@....co" <pawel.moll@....co>,
	"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Add smp support for Allwinner A20(sunxi 7i).

> In which case this kernel patch needs instead to speak the bootloader
> wakeup protocol instead of speaking to the h/w directly like you've done
> here, right?
>
> Or is it possible for the bootloader to set these things up and then put
> the CPU back to sleep such that it both retains any settings and is
> wakable by this patch? This code contains core resets and power control,
> which makes me suspect not.

And I think secondary cpus  remains setting after h/w boot.
>> > Wouldn't it be better to do all this stuff in the bootloader and
>> either
>> > implement PSCI or have the bootloader do the traditional holding pen
>> and
>> > mbox address thing?
Uboot doesnot support PSCI, it use  traditional holding pen for sunxi
platform now.

>> >
>> I have modified uboot to set cntfrq and cntvoff in all smp cpus,and it
>> works well. I guess kernel should believe all cpu should be all same
>> when kernel boot. Bootloader should do it to ensure that.
>
> Yes, I think all CPUs must be in the same state at boot.
>
> But if you've done all that then what is this patch for?
>
> Do you have links to your u-boot patches?
>
> Ian.
Yes, This is my patch for uboot.
My working uboot code is in https://github.com/linux-sunxi/u-boot-sunxi.git
Note this is only test patch. I have not commit it  formally for uboot.

Fan

Download attachment "0001-Add-setting-CNTVOFF-and-CNTFRQ-for-all-smp-cpus.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (11285 bytes)