[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFy6h1c3_rP_bXFedsTXzwW+9Q9MfJaW7GUmMBrAp-fJ9A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 13:08:50 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Cc: Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Charlebois <charlebm@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget LLVMLinux: Removing the use of VLAIS from the
gadget driver
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com> wrote:
>
> I remember there was a discussion of not dropping variable length array
> support, wasn't there ?
We should definitely drop it. The feature is an abomination. I thought
gcc only allowed them at the end of structs, in the middle of a struct
it's just f*cking insane beyond belief.
That said, for *this* particular case, that USB widget driver already
does a ton of small kmalloc's and then remembers the addresses
independently. People may not care about performance, but it *might*
be a good idea to just do one kmalloc()/kfree(), and then still have
those pointer variables, but just be offsets within that one
allocation.
That's what gcc has to basically do for that thing internally
*anyway*, just hidden behind a horrible construct that should never
have existed.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists