[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5240A209.3060202@converseincode.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 15:18:17 -0500
From: Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Charlebois <charlebm@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget LLVMLinux: Removing the use of VLAIS from
the gadget driver
On 09/23/13 15:08, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com> wrote:
>> I remember there was a discussion of not dropping variable length array
>> support, wasn't there ?
> We should definitely drop it. The feature is an abomination. I thought
> gcc only allowed them at the end of structs, in the middle of a struct
> it's just f*cking insane beyond belief.
>
> That said, for *this* particular case, that USB widget driver already
> does a ton of small kmalloc's and then remembers the addresses
> independently. People may not care about performance, but it *might*
> be a good idea to just do one kmalloc()/kfree(), and then still have
> those pointer variables, but just be offsets within that one
> allocation.
>
> That's what gcc has to basically do for that thing internally
> *anyway*, just hidden behind a horrible construct that should never
> have existed.
We can certainly do that instead.
I believe I already have a version of the patch which does just that
(without using macros). I will post it for comment.
Thanks,
Behan
--
Behan Webster
behanw@...verseincode.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists