[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5240CDED.40501@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:25:33 -0700
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
CC: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"Artem S. Tashkinov" <t.artem@...lcity.com>,
lm-sensors@...sensors.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] hwmon: (coretemp) Report power and energy consumption
On 09/23/2013 03:45 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 03:31:33PM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
>> On 09/23/2013 01:34 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> Supported by SandyBridge and newer CPUs.
>>>
>>> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>>> ---
>>> v5: Merged to 3.12-rc1
>>> v4: Replaced INIT_DELAYED_WORK with INIT_DEFERRABLE_WORK
>>> v3: Added Cc:
>>> v2: Fix missing symbol error on i386 builds
>>> Dropped leftover pr_info from debugging
>>>
>>> I am inclined to drop this patch set, as I received neither test nor code
>>> review feedback even though the patch set has been out there for a long time.
>>> Also, I am concerned that it overlaps or even conflicts with the proposed
>>> Power Cap/RAPL driver (https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/19/260).
>> <We feel that the power capping framework is the right place to show
>> the RAPL data. This is not just monitoring but also control.
>> There are other drivers getting developed using this framework to
>> expose an uniform sysfs interface.
> Thought so. Have you thought about providing a hwmon bridge ?
<Good idea. I think after base version is accepted, we can add this. >
>
> Thanks,
> Guenter
Thanks,
Srinivas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists