lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+MoWDpnNjeEN+Crzh2kQ7DPJ_DqEOP4z-9n3=EqP7hiPgZRXg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Sep 2013 21:29:49 +0200
From:	Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...il.com>
To:	Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
Cc:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: checkpatch guide for newbies

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de> wrote:
> Am 24.09.2013 18:36, schrieb Bjorn Helgaas:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 3:01 AM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>                  Long Lines
>>>
>>> Historically screens were 80 characters wide and it was annoying when
>>> code went
>>> over the edge.  These days we have larger screens, but we keep the 80
>>> character
>>> limit because it forces us to write simpler code.
>
>
> Sorry, but that just isn't true and never was. Having a line wide limit of
> 80 characters while forcing tabs to be 8 characters long limits most code to
> just 72 characters. And even less (max 64) inside constructs like if, for or
> while.
>
> The only outcome of that totally silly rule is that variable names will
> become shorted to silly acronyms almost nobody does understand make code
> unreadable.
>
> I always feel like beeing in the IT stone age when programmers thought they
> have to use variable names like a, b and c to save storage, memory or to
> type less when reading linux kernel code.
I was about to disagree because I've never seen variables named a, b
or c, but I found that there are at least 2238 variables named a, b or
c in linux-next. This is not good.

>
> Regards,
>
> Alexander Holler
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors"
> in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ