[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52435A74.3060808@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 23:49:40 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, rjw@...k.pl
CC: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/21] cpuidle: rearrange __cpuidle_register_device()
to keep minimal exit points
On 09/22/2013 03:20 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> This patch rearranges __cpuidle_register_device() a bit in order to reduce the
> number of exit points of this function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 9 ++++-----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> index 211e504..8c91bad 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> @@ -383,13 +383,12 @@ static int __cpuidle_register_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
> list_add(&dev->device_list, &cpuidle_detected_devices);
>
> ret = cpuidle_coupled_register_device(dev);
> - if (ret) {
> + if (ret)
> __cpuidle_unregister_device(dev);
> - return ret;
> - }
> + else
> + dev->registered = 1;
>
> - dev->registered = 1;
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> }
There is no accounting for taste :)
I agree the patch concentrates more the return statement into a single
place which conforms better to the kernel coding style.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists