[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52435B37.1040304@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 23:52:55 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, rjw@...k.pl
CC: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/21] cpuidle: merge two if() statements for checking
error cases
On 09/22/2013 03:21 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Both return same error message and so better write them in a single line.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
modulo the comment on patch 08/21:
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> index aec9029..b8c63cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
> @@ -119,10 +119,7 @@ int cpuidle_idle_call(void)
> struct cpuidle_driver *drv;
> int next_state, entered_state;
>
> - if (cpuidle_disabled())
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> - if (!initialized)
> + if (cpuidle_disabled() || !initialized)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> /* check if the device is ready */
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists