[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5243EE3B.1050600@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:20:11 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/21] cpuidle: change governor from within cpuidle_replace_governor()
On 09/26/2013 08:37 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 26 September 2013 04:20, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>> Actually I am wondering if all this stuff is not over-engineered.
>>
>> There are 2 governors, each of them suits for a specific kernel config,
>> periodic tick or tickless system.
>>
>> menu => tickless system
>> periodic => periodic tick system
>>
>> IMHO, all the code with rating checking and so do not really makes
>> sense. Wouldn't make sense to remove this code ?
>
> I am a newbie here, really can't think of all side effects of this :)
Rafael is pretty busy ATM but may be he can give his feedback on this later.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists