[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5243EF5C.6060908@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:25:00 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/21] cpuidle: use cpuidle_disabled() instead of "off"
On 09/26/2013 07:06 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 26 September 2013 03:22, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On 09/22/2013 03:21 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>> We have a routine for getting value of "off", better call that instead of using
>>> "off" directly.
>>
>> We are in the fast path, I am not sure invoking a function here is
>> better than using directly the static variable.
>
> I only did it for consistency as we have this routine specifically for reading
> value of "off" and so we better don't use off directly..
>
> Probably we can make it static inline and move it into
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h?
If you move it to cpuidle.h, you will have to move the 'off' variable in
the header hence increasing the scope of it.
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists