[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <30413.1380209259@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 16:27:39 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Trond.Myklebust@...app.com, olof@...om.net,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] SunRPC/NFS: Use no_printk() in
J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...ldses.org> wrote:
> > Here's a series of patches to make SunRPC/NFS use no_printk() to implement
> > its null dfprintk() macro (ie. when RPC_DEBUG is disabled). This prevents
> > 'unused variable' errors from occurring when a variable is set only for
> > use in debugging statements and renders RPC/NFS_IFDEBUG unnecessary.
>
> Does this patch series fix any actual warnings? Or does it just change
> the way that we prevent the warnings?
It fixes some unused variable warnings introduced by NFS FS-Cache patches that
I have (a variable is set up and only passed to dfprintk() a couple of times).
I could change those patches to do something different, but I think changing
dfprintk() is actually the right solution as it will catch errors introduced
into dfprintk() calls that are currently reduced to do{}while(0) by the
preprocessor rather than letting the compiler chew on them and then reducing
them to nothing with the optimiser.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists