[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130926153208.GN18242@two.firstfloor.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 17:32:08 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Lin Ming <minggr@...il.com>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: increased vmap_area_lock contentions on "n_tty: Move buffers
into n_tty_data"
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 07:52:23AM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 09/25/2013 11:20 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >Lin Ming <minggr@...il.com> writes:
> >>
> >>Would you like below patch?
> >
> >The loop body keeps rather complex state. It could easily
> >get confused by parallel RCU changes.
> >
> >So if the list changes in parallel you may suddenly
> >report very bogus values, as the va_start - prev_end
> >computation may be bogus.
> >
> >Perhaps it's ok (may report bogus gaps), but it seems a bit risky.
>
> I don't understand how the computed gap would be bogus; there
> _was_ a list state in which that particular gap existed. The fact
It could change any time as you don't have an atomic view
of vm_end / vm_start. It is valid to change the fields
with the lock held.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists