[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FA345DA4F4AE44899BD2B03EEEC2FA9467EB252@SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 15:42:41 +0000
From: "Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
CC: "bfields@...ldses.org" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
"olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/4] SunRPC: Use no_printk() for the null dprintk() and
dfprintk()
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Howells [mailto:dhowells@...hat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2013 10:36 AM
> To: Joe Perches
> Cc: dhowells@...hat.com; bfields@...ldses.org; Myklebust, Trond;
> olof@...om.net; linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] SunRPC: Use no_printk() for the null dprintk() and
> dfprintk()
>
> Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> > no_printk doesn't prevent any argument side-effects from being
> > optimized away by the compiler.
> >
> > ie:
> > dprintk("%d", func())
> > func is now always called when before it wasn't.
>
> Yes, I know. There are half a dozen places where this is the case. Those I've
> wrapped in ifdebug(FACILITY) { ... } in the code. It's not the nicest, but at
> least the compiler always gets to see everything, rather than bits of it getting
> hidden by the preprocessor - which means the call points will be less likely to
> bit rot over time.
Your assumption is that RPC_DEBUG is disabled for most compiles. That is not the case.
Trond
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists