[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5245B076.1090008@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 11:21:10 -0500
From: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
CC: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Benoit Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/9] hwspinlock/omap: add support for dt nodes
On 09/27/2013 11:06 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Sep 17, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
>
>> HwSpinlock IP is present only on OMAP4 and other newer SoCs,
>> which are all device-tree boot only. This patch adds the
>> base support for parsing the DT nodes, and removes the code
>> dealing with the traditional platform device instantiation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/hwlock/omap-hwspinlock.txt | 31 +++++++++++
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile | 3 --
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlock.c | 60 ----------------------
>> drivers/hwspinlock/omap_hwspinlock.c | 23 +++++++--
>> 4 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/omap-hwspinlock.txt
>> delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlock.c
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/omap-hwspinlock.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/omap-hwspinlock.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..235b7c5
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/omap-hwspinlock.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
>> +OMAP4+ HwSpinlock Driver
>> +========================
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible: Currently supports only "ti,omap4-hwspinlock" for
>> + OMAP44xx, OMAP54xx, AM33xx, AM43xx, DRA7xx SoCs
>> +- reg: Contains the hwspinlock register address range (base
>> + address and length)
>> +- ti,hwmods: Name of the hwmod associated with the hwspinlock device
>> +
>> +Common hwlock properties:
>> +The following describes the usage of the common hwlock properties (defined in
>> +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwlock/hwlock.txt) on OMAP.
>> +
>> +- hwlock-base-id: There are currently no OMAP SoCs with multiple
>> + hwspinlock devices. The OMAP driver uses a default
>> + base id value of 0 for the locks present within the
>> + single hwspinlock device on all SoCs.
>> +- hwlock-num-locks: This property is not required on OMAP SoCs, since the
>> + number of locks present within a device can be deduced
>> + from the SPINLOCK_SYSSTATUS device register.
>
> If you are going to be explicit about this properties, you should probably be a bit more clear about them NOT being in the OMAP dts because of the reasons you specify.
You mean on the hwlock-base-id? I wanted to document how these
properties (do not) apply for OMAP, I will revise the text to be a bit
more explicit. Thanks for the review.
regards
Suman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists