[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130928083952.GB26167@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 10:39:52 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, akpm@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [pchecks v2 2/2] percpu: Add preemption checks to __this_cpu ops
* Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > >
> > > I think this is necessary since it seems that the discussions on how
> > > to do the raw_cpu conversions may take some time. If we enable it by
> > > default then there will be numerous new log messages. That way a
> > > developer can enable it for working on this.
> >
> > Note that for these patches to be eligible for upstream merge any
> > extra warnings that trigger must be fixed, regardless of the default
> > setting.
>
> That is exactly what this patch does. There will only be warning if the
> user enabled them.
You didn't understand me apparently: all warnings that trigger with the
debug CONFIG option enabled must be fixed before this can be sent
upstream.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists