[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130928084328.GA5649@amd.pavel.ucw.cz>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 10:43:28 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Trivial patch monkey <trivial@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: new binutils needed for arm in 3.12-rc1
Hi!
> >Given you're not upgrading your binutils anymore that means
> >you'll have to apply that patch only once instead of having to
> >apply it
> >to every kernel upgrade.
>
> Indeed. Patching my own toolchain isn't really a problem. My
> objection was to the Documentation patch telling the world at large
> that for all targets, older binutils aren't supported even on x86.
> That was worth pushing back against.
>
> I don't indend to use old gcc/binutils versions forever, I just want
> to be able to use them until I can replace them with llvm or
> similar.
So, what is the proposal? Just ignore the problem and make people
wonder why their arm kernels are not compiling?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists