[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130930165801.GB25642@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 18:58:01 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] introduce synchronize_sched_{enter,exit}()
On 09/30, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 04:24:00PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > For that we'd have to decrement xxx->gp_count from cb_rcu_func(),
> > wouldn't we?
> >
> > Without that there's no guarantee the fast path readers will have a MB
> > to observe the write critical section, unless I'm completely missing
> > something obviuos here.
>
> Duh.. we should be looking at gp_state like Paul said.
Yes, yes, that is why we have xxx_is_idle(). Its name is confusing
even ignoring "xxx".
OK, I'll try to invent the naming (but I'd like to hear suggestions ;)
and send the patch. I am going to add "exclusive" and "rcu_domain/ops"
later, currently percpu_rw_semaphore needs ->rw_sem anyway.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists