[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130930190434.GA3427@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 21:04:34 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf auto-dep: Speed up feature tests by building them
in parallel
* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net> wrote:
> Em Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:34:27AM -0700, Linus Torvalds escreveu:
> > On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 10:12 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> > <acme@...stprotocols.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > Checking why that strlcpy failed...
> >
> > I don't think glibc does strlcpy. It's not a standard C function, and
>
> My concern was more about the thinking: ``Is this red "OFF" thing a
> problem? I feel so much more confortable when all entries have nice
> green "on" lights...''
Yeah, so I think we should add our internal implementation of strlcpy() as
a __weak function instead - if the libc does not provide then we provide a
fallback.
That should get rid of another ~50 msecs of build overhead, as failed
feature tests are the most expensive ones.
Agreed?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists